Supreme Courtroom says leaked abortion draft is genuine; Roberts orders investigation into leak

Pro-abortion and anti-abortion demonstrators protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court after the leak of a draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito making ready for a majority of the court docket to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights decision later this year, in Washington, U.S., May 3, 2022. 

Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Tuesday confirmed the authenticity of a leaked draft court docket opinion that will toss out longstanding abortion rights, but noted that is not the court's closing decision.

Roberts ordered an investigation into the leaker.

"To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Court docket was supposed to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed," the chief justice stated in a press release. "The work of the Court will not be affected in any means."

"I have directed the Marshal of the Court docket to launch an investigation into the supply of the leak," Roberts said.

The advance publication of a draft opinion is virtually unprecedented for the excessive courtroom, where leaks of any type are exceedingly rare.

The court shares drafts of opinions internally lengthy before they are issued publicly, Roberts noted, calling it "a routine and important part of the Courtroom's confidential deliberative work."

The draft in this high-profile abortion case was created in February, in keeping with Politico, which obtained the opinion.

The justices, legislation clerks and other employees of the courtroom are "intensely loyal to the establishment and devoted to the rule of legislation," Roberts mentioned.

"Court workers have an exemplary and necessary custom of respecting the confidentiality of the judicial course of and upholding the belief of the Courtroom. This was a singular and egregious breach of that trust that is an affront to the Court docket and the neighborhood of public servants who work right here," he said.

The publication of the draft opinion rocked Washington, triggering waves of shock and fury from Democrats who are now pushing for Congress to right away codify abortion rights via laws.

Republicans decried the leak itself, and many known as for the kind of investigation the Roberts introduced late Tuesday morning. The GOP lawmakers who commented on the draft opinion praised it for placing selections about abortion in the arms of states as an alternative of the federal government.

The 98-page draft opinion was penned by Justice Samuel Alito, one of six conservatives on a courtroom that has moved sharply to the correct in the wake of the Trump administration.

Alito's draft would toss out the precedent set by the 1973 case Roe v. Wade and reaffirmed in 1992 by Planned Parenthood v. Casey. These pivotal rulings defend the correct to get an abortion before the purpose of fetal viability and require that rules limiting abortion access don't pose an "undue burden."

Alito wrote: "We hold that Roe and Casey should be overruled."

The draft of the opinion of the court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Group would side with the state of Mississippi in defense of a legislation that will ban virtually all abortions after 15 weeks of being pregnant.

Decrease federal courts had blocked the law on the grounds that it violates the protections established by the Roe and Casey choices.

This is breaking news. Please examine again for updates.