Former Idaho lawmaker found responsible of raping intern
Warning: Undefined variable $post_id in /home/webpages/lima-city/booktips/wordpress_de-2022-03-17-33f52d/wp-content/themes/fast-press/single.php on line 26

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A former Idaho lawmaker was convicted Friday of raping a 19-year-old legislative intern after a dramatic trial in which the younger woman fled the witness stand during testimony, saying “I can’t do that.”
The intern advised a Statehouse supervisor that Aaron von Ehlinger raped her at his residence after the 2 had dinner at a Boise restaurant in March 2021. Von Ehlinger stated the intercourse was consensual.
On the time, the Lewiston Republican was serving as a state consultant, however he later resigned.
Von Ehlinger, 39, was found responsible Friday of rape. He was found not responsible of sexual penetration with a overseas object.
Von Ehlinger sat calmly as the decision was learn, as he has all through the trial.
Afterward, 4th District Choose Michael Reardon told the jury: “This has been an unusual case attended by many sudden circumstances, however I respect your attention ... and arduous work.”
A felony rape conviction carries a minimum sentence of one 12 months in jail in Idaho. The maximum penalty will be as excessive as life in prison, at the judge’s discretion. Sentencing has been scheduled for July 28.
As von Ehlinger was remanded into custody and handcuffed, he talked quietly with his attorney who eliminated gadgets from von Ehlinger’s pockets.
The prosecution remained stoic as they left the courtroom, but as soon as they reached a lower floor they stopped to briefly to congratulate one another on the decision.
Von Ehlinger’s attorney, Jon Cox, couldn't be instantly reached for comment after the trial.
The Associated Press typically does not identify individuals who say they've been sexually assaulted, and has referred to the girl in this case as “Jane Doe” at her request.
In a press conference, Ada County Prosecuting Legal professional Jan Bennetts thanked the jury, investigators and the prosecutors who handled the case.
“Last but not least, it took an unimaginable amount of courage for the sufferer in this case, Jane Doe, to come back forward,” Bennetts stated. “I need to acknowledge the braveness that she took in coming forward.”
Doe testified on the second day of the trial. She haltingly described the moments the alleged assault started, before abruptly leaving the witness stand.
“He tried to put his fingers between my legs and I closed my knees,” Doe mentioned.
At that, she stood up.
“I can’t do this,” she stated, shortly walking out of the courtroom.
The decide gave the prosecuting attorneys 10 minutes to find her to find out if she would return and resume her testimony.
When she did not, the judge instructed the jurors they had to “strike (Doe’s testimony) out of your minds as if it by no means happened,” as a result of the defense couldn't cross-examine her.
In the course of the press conference, Deputy Prosecuting Lawyer Katelyn Farley stated the moment Doe left the trial was “heart-wrenching,” however stated she and deputy prosecutor Whitney Welsh had prepared for trial knowing that Doe might not be able to testify.
“I believe it’s essential that she determined to stroll in the room, and she or he additionally determined to stroll out — these have been her choices,” Welsh mentioned.
During his testimony Thursday, von Ehlinger often spoke in a clear, loud voice directly to jurors, saying he and Doe decided to return to his apartment to “hang out” after eating at a fancy Boise restaurant. Then they began making out on the sofa, he said.
“Issues had been going nicely, and I asked (Doe) if she wish to move to the bedroom,” von Ehlinger stated. “She mentioned ‘Sure.’ We bought up, held fingers and walked into the bedroom.”
Deliberations stretched for seven hours till almost 8 p.m. Thursday earlier than the jury determined to interrupt for the night. At one point, the choose summoned the attorneys to his chambers as a result of the jury requested a question. No particulars had been made public about the jury’s inquiry.
When the allegations became public — largely because of the legislative ethics investigation — Doe confronted unrelenting harassment from some of von Ehlinger’s supporters. Her identify, picture and private details about her life have been repeatedly publicized in “doxxing” incidents. One of the individuals who regularly harassed her was in the courthouse to attend the trial, however regulation enforcement banned the man from the ground the place the case was being heard.
Throughout closing arguments, Farley advised jurors that the case was about “energy within the incorrect palms” used to the “great devastation” of Doe. Von Ehlinger had social, political and bodily power over the petite intern, Farley said.
“He used that energy to rape and forcibly penetrate her,” Farley stated, pointing at von Ehlinger. Doe resisted in a number of methods, she stated, highlighting the testimony of regulation enforcement investigators and a nurse sexual assault examiner who interviewed Doe after the alleged assault.
“Phrases present lack of consent. Excuses of ‘Why this shouldn’t happen’ present lack of consent. Yanking your head back and getting an damage reveals lack of consent,” Farley mentioned.
However von Ehlinger’s lawyer told jurors the prosecution’s case was made up of “red herrings,” and stated von Ehlinger was a credible one who willingly took the stand to share his facet of the story.
The investigators and the nurse who performed the sexual assault exam testified earlier this week. They mentioned Doe reported being pinned down whereas von Ehlinger compelled her to carry out oral sex, and that she knew he incessantly carried a handgun and had placed it on a dresser near the mattress at the time of the assault. The nurse also testified that Doe had a “goose egg” on the back of her head from placing the wall or a headboard whereas trying to jerk her head away from von Ehlinger’s grip.